Ground Control, LLC v. Capsco Industries, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partColeman, Justice
¶ 34. I believe that the majority’s opinion today “dislodge[s] settled rights and expectations” in place when the Legislature enacted Section 31-3-15 and results in the Court de facto substituting its own policy judgments for that of the Legislature and judicially abrogating much of the effect of Section 31-3-15. Therefore, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. The Mississippi Legislature enacted Mississippi Code Section 31-3-21. That section of our law, in combination with Section 31-3-2, explicitly makes the conduct of both Ground Control and Capsco illegal and contrary to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Hubbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- PMZ Oil Co. v. LucroyMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Price v. Purdue Pharma Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis WaterparkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.