Legal Opinion

Baker-Smith v. Skolnick

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 9, 2019No. B282946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

*515*341A flying mattress made Mackenzie Baker-Smith swerve on the freeway and crash at high speed. She sued a company for failing to secure the mattress. The jury ruled against her, but heard an incorrect jury instruction about negligence per se. This doctrine presumes defendants are negligent if *342they violate a law. A special exception excuses law violations if a defendant can prove it tried but could not comply with the law. Giving that excuse instruction here was error. We reverse and remand.

I

We summarize the case in the trial court. The first essential point is the Vehicle Code requires cargo…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. United States v. Carroll Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. S. Cal. Gas Co. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.(In Re S. Cal. Gas Leak Cases)California Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doe v. Brightstar Residential IncorporatedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API