Legal Opinion
Vidal v. SunTrust Bank
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 4, 2010No. 4D09-3019PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
Jose Vidal appeals from a non-final order denying his motion to quash service of process. He claims that service was defective because the process server failed to note the time of service on the copy of the complaint served. Because the requirement to note the time on a copy of the complaint is a statutory requirement of service, and strict compliance with statutory requirements of service is mandated, we conclude that failure to note the time of service renders the service defective. We therefore reverse.
Vidal obtained an equity line of credit from SunTrust. Subsequently SunTrust filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Electro Engineering Products Co., Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSP. OF FLORIDA v. WelkerSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Haney v. Olin CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Sierra Holding v. Inn Keepers Supply Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Abbate v. Provident Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- David Davidian and Irma Davidian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Raul J. Cepero a/k/a Raul De Jesus Cepero and Leslie Cepero v. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Mills Corp. v. AmatoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Cruz v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Nirk v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.