Legal Opinion

Peter Licavoli v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 14, 1961No. 15764_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was indicted, tried by jury, and convicted of failing and refusing to appear before the Senate Select Committee on Improper Activities in the Labor or Management Field, after having been subpoenaed to appear. His principal point here is that the trial judge erred in refusing to instruct the jury that if the accused acted upon the advice of counsel they should acquit; indeed the judge instructed to the contrary.

Appellant says the offense with which he was charged, 1 willfully making default, includes as an element a specific intent, i e., willfulness. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corporation and Willard R. CusterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. TobinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
  3. United States v. Stephen BannonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. NavarroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  5. United States v. Peter NavarroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API