Legal Opinion
In Re Rutledge
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 15, 1997No. 8-19-71017PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOROTHY EISENBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Court is called upon to decide whether the Bankruptcy Code will permit a Chapter 13 debtor who is not the original mortgagor under a mortgage, and who has not assumed the mortgage, to cure pre-petition arrears and reinstate the mortgage. The issue arose upon the Court’s consideration of the motion by Yasuda Bank & Trust Company U.S.A. (‘Yasuda”), a secured claimant, to dismiss the Chapter 13 ease of Horace Rutledge (the “Debtor”) with prejudice or, alternatively, to vacate the automatic stay to permit Yasuda to continue foreclosure proceedings commenced…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Joseph C. Taddeo and Ellen A. Taddeo, Debtors. Elfriede Di Pierro v. Joseph C. Taddeo and Ellen A. Taddeo and Richard J. McCord Interim TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Ronald E. Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Ulster Savings Bank v. Kizelnik (In Re Kizelnik)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Garcia (In Re Garcia)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2002
- In Re MullinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- In Re TrappUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
- In Re AllenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- In Re TewellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.