Legal Opinion

Dillen v. Remley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1959No. 22931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPERRY, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs, the owners of certain farm lands described in their petition, sued defendants, who owned farm lands contiguous thereto, seeking an easement over defendants’ lands for use in constructing drainage facilities from plaintiffs’ property to an existing open drainage ditch. Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiffs petition because of lack of jurisdiction to grant any relief prayed. The following entry appears of record:

“Wherefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and the same hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, costs…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. SieversSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. McDowell, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Douglas v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Hull v. BaumannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Woods v. CantrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of NocitaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. City of Cape Girardeau v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. HolmesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Plaza Point Investments, Inc. v. DunnawayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Chenoweth v. ChenowethMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API