Legal Opinion

State v. Matlock

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 9, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Harrison District Court. The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of tbe tbe crime of bigamy, and be appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrooK, J.

I. It appears from tbe evidence that tbe defendant was married to one Susan Worth, in Union county, in tbis state, and that tliere were two children, tbe issue of this marriage. Afterwards tbe defendant, under tbe name of William Jones, married a woman named Emma Houston. A short time after the second marriage tbis prosecution was commenced against him. Tbe evidence clearly identified tbe defendant as a party to both marriages, and no claim is made that tbe first marriage bad been annulled when tbe second marriage took place. Tbe evidence identifying tbe defendant is so conclusive that we do…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SchaunhurstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. State v. . BehrmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. State v. . BehrmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API