Legal Opinion
Jose Alanniz v. William Barr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 20, 2019No. 15-72792PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE MAURICIO ALANNIZ, No. 15-72792 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A073-815-349 WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 12, 2019* Pasadena, California Filed May 20, 2019 Before: Dorothy W. Nelson and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Edward R. Korman,** District Judge. Opinion by Judge Callahan * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). **…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Leng May Ma v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Carlos Conde Quevedo v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Bent v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Jose Hernandez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Eduardo Enriquez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.