Legal Opinion
Houston v. Queen
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided March 25, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-2738PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
ELIZABETH ERNY FOOTE, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Defendant EP Energy E & P Company, L.P.’s Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. [Record Document 18].1 Defendant Vernetta Queen is not a party to this motion and has filed her own Motion To Dismiss on different grounds. [Record Document 12]. Because subject matter jurisdiction is a threshold issue as to all Defendants in this case, this ruling applies to the claim against Defendant Queen. Plaintiffs’ complaint in this Court calls upon the Court to review and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bowling v. DahlheimerDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
- Margaret Alexandra Alexander v. Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections, et al.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2026