State v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellant State of Minnesota asserts that the district court clearly erred by dismissing a felony murder charge and concluding that neither felon in possession nor possession of a stolen firearm can serve as predicate offenses to felony murder. Because the district court erroneously failed to consider the manner in which respondent committed the other crimes and, because respondent’s possession of a loaded shotgun posed a special danger to human life when pointed at the victim’s head from a few feet away, we reverse.
FACTS
On February 26, 2002, respondent,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SatchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. ForsmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- United States v. BennittCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- United States v. BennittCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.