Branson v. Exide Electronics Corp.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
On May 3, 1990, the plaintiff-appellant, Bernard M. Branson (“Branson”), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, filed a class action complaint (the “complaint”) against Exide Electronics Corporation (“Exide”), its Board of Directors (the “individual defendants"), and the underwriters of Exide’s initial public offering (collectively the “defendants”). The complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, by disseminating a materially misleading registration statement and prospectus (the “Prospectus”) in connection…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- John Madara v. Daryl HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Sternberg v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Falkirk Mining Co. v. Japan Steel Works, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Sternberg v. O'NEILCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
3Cited by18 opinions
- North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. GheewallaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Solomon v. Pathe Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Werner v. Miller Technology Management, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- Kelvin Bourke v. Grey Wolf Drilling Company, LP, Now Known as Precision Drilling Company, LPWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Ryburn v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.