Legal Opinion

Ward v. Pine

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited Tayon v. Ladue, 38 Mo. 209 ; Hubla v. Pallen, 11 Ind. 273 ; Blake w Done, 7 Hurl. & Nor. 464.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge

The St. Clair Coal Mining Company commenced this suit, alleging in their petition that the company was a corporation made under the laws of Illinois. Afterwards the plaintiffs were permitted to file an amended petition in their names, alleging that they were copartners, and as such formed the said St. Clair Coal Mining Company, and as partners under that name sold to the defendant the coal sued for, and filed with their petition an account made out in their copartnership names for the identical items referred to in the original petition.

The defendant objected to this amendment, asserting that…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark Estate Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Hackett v. Van FrankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. B. F. Glover & Son Commission Co. v. Abilene Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Gunther Bros. v. AylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API