(PC) Bartholomew v. Moss
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KEVIN BARTHOLOMEW, No. 2:17-cv-2551-KJM-EFB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 S. MOSS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF 18 Nos. 31 & 33. For the reasons stated hereafter, it is recommended that defendants’ motion be 19 granted in part and plaintiff’s be denied. 20 Legal Standards 21 A. Summary Judgment 22 Summary…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.