Legal Opinion
Sarnecka-Crouch v. Billington
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2006-1169Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Notice of Motion and Motion to Reopen and to Enforce the Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal [# 50]. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion will be granted insofar as the Court concludes that, as the defendant concedes, it has jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and that it should exercise ancillary jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim for damages for the asserted delay in the defendant’s complying with the terms of the • settlement agreement.
Background
1. This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, AlbertoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Greenhill, Frances v. Spellings, MargaretCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Allen v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.