Legal Opinion
Young v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 9, 2011No. 1D10-6410PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant is appealing an order in which the trial court struck the appellant’s postconviction claims as facially insufficient and, in accordance with Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 761 (Fla.2007), granted the appellant thirty days to amend. The order is a nonappealable, nonfinal order. See Lee v. State, 939 So.2d 154, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
DISMISSED.
BENTON, C.J., HAWKES and CLARK, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Corn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Michael W. Corn v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Robert Glen Hill I I v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Stewart Charles Bond v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016