Legal Opinion
Big Apple Supermarkets, Inc. v. Corkdale Realty Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stakislaw, J.
Petitioner Big Apple Supermarkets, Inc. (hereinafter “ Big Apple ”) moves by order to show cause in this special proceeding, for: (1) the assignment of two mortgages held by respondent Corkdale Realty, Inc. (hereinafter “ Corkdale ”), covering certain real estate which is the subject of a pending foreclosure action; and (2) a stay of proceeding in said action pending a determination of movant’s right to the assignment.
Respondent Corkdale cross-moves for: (1) severance of the special proceeding and the foreclosure action; and (2) an order restraining and enjoining Big Apple from dealing in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gerseta Corporation v. Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Acer v. . HotchkissNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Pease v. . EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Twombly v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Averill v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dominion Financial Corp. v. 275 Washington Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Lebovits v. Halpern (In re Lehal Realty Associates)District Court, S.D. New York · 1989