Clark v. Clark

Petitioner Audrey Clark seeks certiorari review of a trial court order requiring her to submit to vocational testing by her former husband’s expert, who may exclude recording, court reporting or other people from being present during that testing. We find that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law, resulting in material harm of an irreparable nature, in allowing the expert to exclude recording, reporting or other people from being present.

This case is controlled by Gibson v. Gibson, 456 So.2d 1320 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), in which the majority held that a wife was…