Legal Opinion

Wood v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 2, 1970No. 48-69PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Barney,' J.

Sugar is not an approved automobile engine additive. On May 3, 1968, the plaintiff discovered that mis*442chief had been done to his car by persons unknown, through the dumping of sugar into his gasoline tank and down his oil filler pipe. He called on the defendant for help under a vandalism clause in his insurance policy.

Help was forthcoming. The car was taken to a garage and certain corrective procedures undertaken to remove the sugar. The evidence demonstrated that sugar in the gasoline tank would tend to cut off the fuel supply, and, if it reached the carburetor and combustion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LaFaso v. LaFasoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  2. Benoit v. MarvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  3. Davis v. Bowers Granite Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1903
  4. Harris v. BeldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Girroir v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API