Legal Opinion
John A. Tolman Co. v. Griffin
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Kent; Grove, J. Assumpsit by Jobn A. Tolman Company against M. Francis Griffin and another on a contract of guaranty. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action on a contract of guaranty which reads as follows:
*302“In consideration of the sum of one dollar and other valuable considerations received from John A. Tolman Co., the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I hereby guarantee the payment to John A. Tolman Co. of any and all moneys collected by J. P. Yisner for account of John A. Tolman Co., and for all moneys which they may from time to time advance to said J. P. Yisner, and any and all indebtedness now due, or which may hereafter become due, John A. Tolman Co., in excess of the amount due said J. P. Yisner, as per the present…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Gibson v. Agricultural Life Ins. Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- John A. Tolman Co. v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- John A. Tolman Co. v. ButtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Hoadley v. W.T. Rawleigh CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Texaco, Inc. v. CliftonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978