Legal Opinion

Hargrove v. Shinseki

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 6, 2011No. 19-1303PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1378Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MOORE.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Mr. Leland Hargrove appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus by the Veterans Court. Hargrove v. Shinseki, No. 09-2657, slip op., 2009 WL 3493019 (C.A.V.C. Oct. 27, 2009). No other issue is properly before us. Because Mr. Hargrove had not exhausted his administrative remedies before filing his petition — indeed, he still had time to appeal through the administrative process when the court issued its denial — the Veterans Court did not abuse its discretion in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Carl v. Lamb, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Mukand International, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  4. AG v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Beasley v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Coleman v. Dept. Of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Beasley v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Davis v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  5. Dray v. Dept. Of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API