Hargrove v. Shinseki
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*1378Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MOORE.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Mr. Leland Hargrove appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus by the Veterans Court. Hargrove v. Shinseki, No. 09-2657, slip op., 2009 WL 3493019 (C.A.V.C. Oct. 27, 2009). No other issue is properly before us. Because Mr. Hargrove had not exhausted his administrative remedies before filing his petition — indeed, he still had time to appeal through the administrative process when the court issued its denial — the Veterans Court did not abuse its discretion in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Carl v. Lamb, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Mukand International, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- AG v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beasley v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Coleman v. Dept. Of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Beasley v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Davis v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Dray v. Dept. Of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.