Legal Opinion

Mullinax v. Waybright

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, President:

This action was commenced on March 17, 1887, before a justice of Pendleton county by Henry Mullinax against James B. Waybright upon an account for $147.00. On the return-day of the summons, which was March 26, 1887, the plaintiff and defendant were both present, and the defendant moved for a continuance of the case, “on the grounds of being without counsel, and the absence of a witness.” The justice having examined the defendant on oath, and'thus ascertained that he had made no effort to obtain counsel, and had not had his witness summoned, he overruled the *85said motion, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Todd & Smith v. GatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Poole v. DilworthWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Webster v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Cicerello v. C. & O. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Harman v. HoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
  4. Harman v. HoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
  5. Harman v. HoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API