Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Monaco

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Motion by defendant, Grand Union Company, to dismiss the complaint against it for failure to state a cause of action.

The plaintiff was injured in a parking lot of a shopping center in Flushing, New York. The initial injury was received when plaintiff’s car and a vehicle operated by the defendant Monaco were in collision, and the subsequent injury when the plaintiff got out of his car and was struck by the same vehicle. The defendant, Grand Union Co., operates one of the stores in the shopping area.

The complaint must be sustained if it states in some recognizable form a cause of action known…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Cohen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Curry v. Baisley Park AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API