Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tingley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 28, 1986No. 85-1003Published

1DissentDauksch, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The state obtained a conviction for crimes which were not alleged in the indictment, i.e. convictions for sexual batteries on dates other than the dates alleged in the indictment. There is no authority for a state attorney to amend an indictment in such a manner as to go outside the crimes charged in the indictment. Only a grand jury has the authority to alter an indictment. Pickeron v. State, 94 Fla. 268, 113 So. 707 (1927); Dickson v. State, 20 Fla. 800 (1884); Phelan v. State, 448 So.2d 1256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Perez v. State, 371 So.2d 714 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979);…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BeamonSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Pickeron v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Russell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Dickson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API