Legal Opinion

State v. McIntyre

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1990No. CR89-1034PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Judge.

The issues presented by this appeal are whether the trial judge erred in entering a judgment of guilty and sentencing defendant when he was not present in court and whether the sentence was imposed in compliance with sentencing guidelines and not excessive.

James McIntyre (hereinafter defendant) was charged by bill of information with the crime of possession of cocaine with intent *801to distribute, a felony in violation of La. R.S. 40:967(A). Defendant pled not guilty and was tried before a jury. The jury unanimously found the defendant guilty as charged. Defendant’s Motion For A New…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MonkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  2. State v. ChampagneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. State v. MonkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. State v. FordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. State v. ElieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. State v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. State v. HenneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. State v. DebargeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API