Legal Opinion
C.G. Holdings, Inc. v. Rum Jungle, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 23, 2008No. 1:07-cv-00534PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VITALIANO, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
In July 2007, plaintiff C.G. Holdings, Inc. (“C.G. Holdings”) initiated an action in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada against defendant Rum Jungle, Inc., (“Rum Jungle”) alleging violations of the Lanham Act. Rum Jungle failed to appear in the Nevada action and a default judgment was entered against it on November 2, 2007. The judgment awarded C.G. Holdings the following relief: (1) statutory damages in the amount of $100,000; (2) attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $26,360.19; and (3) a permanent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Futura Development of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Estado Libre Asociado De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Epperson v. Entertainment Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Aaron v. MattikowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Estate of Ungar v. Orascom Telecom Holding S.A.E.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bautista v. ABC Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Cortes v. Juquila Mexican Cuisine Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022