Legal Opinion

Mower v. Olsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1917No. 2967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Seventh District; Hon. A. H. Christensen, Judge. Action by Hyrum D. Mower against William Olsen and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, J.

This was an action brought to recover damages for trespass of defendants sheep on plaintiff’s lands. A trial to the court without a jury resulted in judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

The complaint describes and alleges the ownership in the plaintiff of certain lands in Sanpete County; that during the times mentioned in the coinplaint the defendants were the owners, in possession, and chargeable with the care of about 1,000 head of sheep; that at divers times during the month of May, 1915, and particularly on the 12th, 13th, 15th, 17th, 18th, 19th, 21st, and 22d of said month of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buford v. HoutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Lazarus v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Victoria Copper Mining Co. v. HawsUtah Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Buford v. HoutzUtah Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Thomas v. BlytheUtah Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Garcia v. SumrallArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kendrick v. HealyWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Olson v. ScottUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Winters v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hall v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API