Garlington v. Wasson

On Motion for Rehearing

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Appellants have filed an able motion for rehearing in which they are respectfully critical of our conclusion that, despite the existence of procedural errors, *679the judgment denying, the Garlingtons recovery should be affirmed for the reason that no other judgment could properly have been rendered. Appellants contend they have a right by bill of review to set aside the judgment rendered in cause 3807 on May 24, 1941, in the District Court of Howard County primarily because the land in controversy was then still within the exclusive jurisdiction of…