Kallstrom v. O'CALLAGHAN
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is a suit for specific performance of an “option agreement” to purchase a two acre parcel of land. ① Defendants appeal from a decree ordering them to perform their obligations under the agreement, including the execution of a deed conveying the property to plaintiff.
Defendants contend on this appeal: (1) that the “option agreement” was invalid for lack of consider ation; (2) that it was also invalid for lack of a proper description of the land involved, and (3) that the real estate broker who negotiated the transaction lacked authority to act as defendants’ agent.
The “option agreement”…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Bogard v. BarhanOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Kingsley v. KresslyOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Zimmerman v. Sunset Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Friendly v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORT OF ASTORIA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Western Hills, Oregon, Ltd. v. PfauOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Fleckenstein v. FaccioAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Wall v. SEC Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.