American Commerce Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
At issue in this appeal is whether the phrase “series of related acts” in a business insurance policy is ambiguous and, if it is not ambiguous, how many “occurrences” arose under the policy. Minnesota Mutual Fire and Casualty Company seeks review of a Minnesota Court of Appeals decision holding that the phrase “series of related acts” in an insurance policy with its insured, American Commerce, was ambiguous. Because that phrase was held ambiguous, the court of appeals declined to determine how many occurrences arose under the policy and remanded the case to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- General Mills, Inc. v. Gold Medal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Auto Lenders Acceptance Corp. v. Gentilini Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Leonard v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. FordMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. DGG & Car, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.