Legal Opinion

CLF v Continental Paving

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided December 6, 2016No. 16-cv-339-JLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Civil No. 16-cv-339-JL Opinion No.

2016 DNH 220

Continental Paving, Inc., d/b/a Concord Sand & Gravel MEMORANDUM OPINION “Organizational standing” is a frequently contested issue in citizen enforcement actions. In the case at bar, Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) alleges that Continental Paving, Inc., (operating under the trade name Concord Sand & Gravel), violated the Federal Water Pollution Control Act by discharging polluted water without proper authorization or permits. CLF seeks declaratory and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API