Johnson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant raises, among other issues, a double jeopardy challenge to multiple convictions and sentences for grand theft of property between $300 and $20,000 and of a firearm for his single act of purse snatching. See Sections 812.014(2)(c) 1. and 3., Florida Statutes (1987). Since this act occurred after the. amendment to the rule of lenity became effective (see Section 775.-021, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988)), we AFFIRM as to this point. See Davis v. State, 560 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA), jurisdiction accepted, 568 So.2d 435 (Fla.1990); Porterfield v. State, 567 So.2d 429, 430 n. 2 (Fla.1990);…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- St. Fabre v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- State v. HattenSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992