Legal Opinion · Dissent
State v. Butler
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 11, 1991No. 1576Published
1DissentGrey, Judge
I respectfully dissent because I believe that the trial court erred in admitting Sheriff Hamman’s testimony because he was incompetent to testify pursuant to Evid.R. 601(C) and R.C. 4549.14 and 4549.16.
Evid.R. 601(C) provides:
“Every person is competent to be a witness except:
a * * *
“(C) An officer, while on duty for the exclusive or main purpose of enforcing traffic laws, arresting or assisting in the arrest of a person charged with a traffic violation punishable as a misdemeanor where the officer at the time of the arrest was not using a properly marked motor vehicle as defined by statute or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Dayton v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Columbus v. MurchisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Village of Brookville v. LouthanNew York County Court, Montgomery County · 1982