Legal Opinion

Indian Head Mills v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 30, 1924No. 6 Div. 210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Appellant, defendant in the trial court, leased a storehouse to plaintiff “for one year from the 1st of January, 1921.” The lease contract contained this stipulation:

“The party of the first part [Indian Head Mills] agrees that should they decide to lease the commissary [the storehouse in question] for the [year] 1922 to, give party of the second part refusal of same.”

The complaint alleges that defendant breached its agreement for further lease by leasing the premises to another for the year 1922, thereby causing plaintiff to suffer loss and damage.

The agreement to renew was, by implication,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Drake v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. McClintock v. JoynerMississippi Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Epperson v. StaceySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Wyuta Cattle Co. v. ConnellWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Alabama Butane Gas Co. v. Tarrant Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Womack v. HycheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Longshore v. MaggioSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API