Legal Opinion

Lerman v. Lerman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 13, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAFTE, J.S.C.

Under what circumstances may an adverse party in a matrimonial action be called as a witness and to what extent shall that testimony be binding? This court holds not only that an adverse party may be called as a witness, but that such witness shall be deemed “hostile per se,” thus triggering all concomitant means of examination permissible under the law.

In lay terms, “hostile” is “of or pertaining to an enemy; antagonistic.” The American Heritage Dictionary 624 (2 Coll, ed. 1985). A witness is hostile or adverse when there is a manifestation of “so much hostility or prejudice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Becker v. EisenstodtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. In Re Application of Howard Savings Bk.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. State v. RajnaiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Hickman v. PaceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Krafte v. BelfusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marsico v. MarsicoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  2. In re the Settlement of the Accounts of UnanueNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. L.M. VS. A.M. (FM-04-1330-18, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API