Legal Opinion

District 50 Metropolitan Recreation District v. Burnside

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 9, 1968No. 22140PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

The individually named plaintiffs in error are owners of residential property located within the District 50 Metropolitan Recreation District. They and the District appeared as plaintiffs in the trial court; were represented by the same attorneys; and urged the court to grant the same relief. Accordingly, all plaintiffs in error will be referred to as plaintiffs or the district. The prayer of their complaint was as follows:

“WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray this Court to enter an Order declaring Chapter 89, Article 12, Section 8, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1953, to be unconstitutional as it exempts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCarty v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. Champlin Refining Co. v. CruseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  3. People Ex Rel. Dunbar v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. A.B. Hirschfeld Press, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Huddleston v. Grand County Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Keefe v. Kirschenbaum & Kirschenbaum, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Lee v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Colorado Department of Social Services v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API