Matter of Smith v. . O.M. Osterheld Son
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 21, 1919, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial commission, made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant’s husband, on the day of his death, was engaged in the regular course of his employment, helping to unload a freight car which contained lumber, and load it on to a truck sent there for that purpose.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 21, 1919, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial commission, made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant’s husband, on the day of his death, was engaged in the regular course of his employment, helping to unload a freight car which contained lumber, and load it on to a truck sent there for that purpose. At about ten o’clock in the morning he went to the office of the Central Railroad of New Jersey at the Bronx terminal on the easterly…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Caedozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Norris v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- In re the Claim of VincentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928