Legal Opinion

Griffith v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2010No. 2009-1363PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} The issue in this case is whether a claim for wrongful imprisonment may originate, in certain circumstances, in the Court of Claims. We hold that all claims for wrongful imprisonment must originate in a court of common pleas.

Factual and Procedural Background

{¶ 2} Appellee Gerry E. Griffith Jr. was charged in federal district court with possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking. He moved to suppress evidence of the gun, arguing that the consent to the search that yielded the gun was obtained due to an unlawful arrest. The court denied the motion, finding that the police…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Walden v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Doss v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State ex rel. O'Malley v. Russo (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. D'Ambrosio v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Drown v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In Re Barnhart)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API