Legal Opinion

Tierney v. Klein

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the chancery court of Warren county. Hon. W. R. Trigg, Chancellor. Prior to November 21, 1883, George M. Klein and Julius M. Klein were partners in the insurance business in Vicksburg, under the name of Julius M. Klein & Co., and as such held the agencies for several insurance companies which had a well-established business in that city. These agencies were held under the appointment of the companies, and were terminable or transferablé at the will of the companies.

Read the full summary

From the chancery court of Warren county. Hon. W. R. Trigg, Chancellor. Prior to November 21, 1883, George M. Klein and Julius M. Klein were partners in the insurance business in Vicksburg, under the name of Julius M. Klein & Co., and as such held the agencies for several insurance companies which had a well-established business in that city. These agencies were held under the appointment of the companies, and were terminable or transferablé at the will of the companies. George M. Klein was at the time a partner with John A. Klein in the banking business in that city, and owned and conducted…

1Opinion of the Court · WoodsWoods, C. J.

The complainants, as creditors of George M. Klein, exhibited their original and amended bills against George Klein, Julius Klein, and William Klein, to reach and subject to the payment of their demands as against George Klein his alleged interests in the insurance agencies of Julius Klein & Co., and of Julius Klein & Bro., the averments being that these insurance agencies were either conducted in the interest of George Klein solely, or that George Klein was interested as a partner in them.

It is strenuously insisted by counsel for appellants that, as it is shown George Klein had an equal…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Woods.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. Van NostrandNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  2. Hart v. BloomfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pollock v. RalstonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Douthart v. LoganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  3. Commercial Bank v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API