Legal Opinion

Glatz v. City & County of Denver

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1986No. 85CA0506PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRISWELL, Judge.

Intervenors, who live near land owned by plaintiff, Frank Glatz (Glatz), appeal the trial court’s judgment which reversed a zoning decision of the Denver Board of Adjustment (Board). They assert that the trial court erred in concluding that the Board’s pertinent findings were without ev-identiary support. We agree and reverse the judgment.

The subject of the Board’s proceedings was Glatz’s parcel of realty, which is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of South Raritan Street and West Pacific Place in Denver. This land was initially zoned R-l, which zoning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Rancho Colorado, Inc. v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Hurley v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Beth Israel Hospital & Geriatric Center v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. C-Y Development Co. v. City of RedlandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Colorado Springs v. SecurCare Self Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Jackson & Co.(USA), Inc. v. Town of AvonColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. City of Colorado Springs v. SecurCare Self Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API