Legal Opinion

Spannhake v. Mountain Construction Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 8, 1912Published

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Otto L. Spannhake against the Mounain Construction Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

This action is brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed by plaintiff for services performed as an architect. The labor which the lien specified that the plaintiff did consisted in “drawing plans and specifications for new apartment houses, measuring and laying out work.” The lien claimed $675 to be due the plaintiff; and $580 of this sum the plaintiff claimed to be due for the preparation of the plans and specifications, and $95 for visits which he made to the premises and for supervision which he claims to have exercised.

The learned court below rendered judgment for the plaintiff upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Rinn v. Electric Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Brooklyn Heights Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API