Legal Opinion

1840 Concourse Associates, LP v. Praetorian Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this action for breach of contract based on a commercial property policy issued by defendant insurer to plaintiff property owner, defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that plaintiff commenced this action after expiration of the two-year limitations period contained in the policy (see Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co., 70 NY2d 966, 967-968 [1988]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the action was governed by the six-year statute of limitations set forth in CPLR 213 (id.). Moreover, plaintiff failed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BALUK, SVETLANA v. NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. John v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. John v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API