Legal Opinion
Crucia v. Behrman
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 16, 1917No. 22494PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Action by Joseph Crueia against Martin Behrman, Mayor, and others. On application by Joseph Crueia for writs of mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition.
1Opinion of the CourtProyostx, J.
The relator obtained from the respondent judge an order for an injunction, and in due course the injunction issued. The next day the respondent judge, in open court, in the presence of counsel, ex proprio motu, set aside the order as having *371been granted by him improvidently, for tbe reason that the practice for 20 years past had been not to grant injunctions against the city of New Orleans without preliminary hearing having been first had on rule to show cause. Immediately following the entry of this ruling on the minutes appears the following:
“By Mr. Reiiley (counsel for the city)': Try it…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jackson v. MichieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hope v. MadisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Crucia v. BehrmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Greater New Orleans Homestead Ass'n v. KornerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Crucia v. BehrmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920