County of Dodge v. Kemnitz
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Dodge county. Tried below before Marshall, J. Cottrell v. State, 9 Neb., 125; Musser v. Steioart, 21 O. St., 353; Nixon v. Perry, 3 S. E. Rep. [Ga.], 253; People v. Tiling, 6 Barb. [N. Y.], 366. People v. Tiling, 6 Barb. [N. Y.], 363; Nixon v. Perry, 3 S. E. Rep. [Ga.], 253; 2 Am. & Eng. Ency.-Law, 142.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This case was before this court in 1889, and is reported in 28 Neb., 224, the judgment being reversed.
On the second trial the jury found the defendant guilty, whereupon the court rendered judgment that he was the *239putative father of the child and required him to give a good and sufficient bond to Dodge county in the sum of $1,000, “conditioned that he will save the county of Dodge free from all expense on account of the support of said bastard child,” etc.
This bond has been given and approved, but the county contends there should have been a provision for the support of the child. Section 6,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- County of Dodge v. KemnitzNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dodge County v. KemnitzNebraska Supreme Court · 1894