Legal Opinion

Boomer v. Caraway

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1995No. 596PA94PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In affirming summary judgment for the defendant, the Court of Appeals said that it could not find defendant was estopped from asserting the statute of limitation defense “[w]ithout evidence that defendant had an affirmative duty to seek judicial approval of the settlement.” Boomer v. Caraway, 116 N.C. App. 723, 726, 449 S.E.2d 215, 218 (1994). We disavow this language to the extent that it suggests *187that the question of who has the duty to seek judicial approval of a settlement is one involving the presentation of evidence rather than a question of law. In all other respects, we agree with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boomer v. CarawayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frost v. AmSafe Commercial Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API