Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Robinson v. Kuhen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1924No. Appeal, 63Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

Keller:

I concur in the judgment of reversal but not for the reason given in the majority opinion. The property was first rented at $17 per month; subsequently the rent was raised to $20 per month; and this rental covered the term from the first day to the last day of each calendar month. The lessee held over for several years. This constituted a tenancy from month to month, not a tenancy at will: Hollis v. Burns, 100 Pa. 206; Hood v. Drysdale, 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 540; and the tenant was entitled to full 30 days’ notice before the expiration of his monthly term, which in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hollis v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. Hood v. DrysdaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API