Legal Opinion

Niggel Assocs., Inc. v. Polo'S of North Myrtle Beach, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 31, 1988No. 1235PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

These actions for restitution were commenced by two contractors who furnished labor and materials in connection with the renovation of a building. The contractors, Niggel Associates, Inc., and Mechanical Industrial, Inc., each sued Windy Hill Golf, Inc., and others, seeking to recover for work they performed under contracts with Beach Investments, a South Carolina general partnership. The separate suits were consolidated by the circuit court. The court held that Windy Hill was liable, on the principle of unjust enrichment, to pay both Contractors for the work. Windy Hill appeals.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Barrett v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Inglese v. BealCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  3. Barnes v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  4. Campbell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Lewis v. Omni Indemnity Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API