Legal Opinion

Muller v. Stemmler

New York Marine Court

Decided May 23, 1874Published

Motion on, the part of plaintiff for judgment, on account of the frivolousness of the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The complaint charges that the plaintiff and his wife, Christina, bargained with the defendants to buy of them two lots of land in Long Island city, and that the defendants, colluding and conspiring together for the purpose, and with the intent of deceiving, cheating, and defrauding the plaintiff and liis wife, falsely and fraudulently represented that the said two lots were free and clear of and from all incumbrances, when they knew that the representation was, in fact, false, and that the lots, with other contiguous property, were incumbered by a mortgage of $179,000, then in process of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Torrey v. . TorreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Goelet v. GoriNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Bradstreet v. BaerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Everit v. WattsNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  5. King v. WicksOhio Supreme Court · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API