Commonwealth v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eoberts,
Appellant filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act, Act of January 25, 1966, P. L. (1965), 1580, 19 P.S. §1180-1 et seq. (Snpp. 1969), alleging, inter alia, that he was without financial resources to obtain counsel and requesting that counsel be appointed. The petition was dismissed without appointment of counsel and without a hearing.
Section 12 of the Post Conviction Hearing Act “imposes a mandatory requirement upon the trial court to appoint counsel for an indigent post-conviction applicant.” Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 427 Pa. 395, 396, 235 A. 2d…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WaltersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. MinnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SangriccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HobsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.