Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2010No. 71A03-1003-CR-115PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Cullen Davis Walker was convicted of burglary, robbery, and criminal confinement, all as Class B felonies. On appeal, he contends that two of these convictions should be vacated pursuant to the continuing crime doctrine. We conclude that the continuing crime doctrine does not apply because Walker was charged with distinct chargeable crimes. However, after considering the oral and written sentencing statements, we conclude that Walker's con-viection for eriminal confinement is improperly reflected in the Amended Judgment of Conviction & Sentencing Order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. McElroy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Haggard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Boyd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Cornelius Hines v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Maurice Frazier v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Antonio L. Vaughn v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Cesar Chavez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Koch v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API