Legal Opinion
Rushing v. ALCOA, INC.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 4, 2005No. 31019-8-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 P.3d 996 (2005)
Daniel J. RUSHING, Appellant,
v.
ALCOA, INC., and the Department of Labor & Industries, Respondent.
No. 31019-8-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
January 4, 2005.
Gilbert M. Stratton, Craig Jessup & Stratton PLLC, Seattle, Lisa Marsh, Atty. Gen. of Wash., Steve Vinyard, Atty. Gen. of Wash., for Respondents.
Donald Gene Grant, Grant & Elcock PLLC, Vancouver, for Appellant.
ARMSTRONG, J.
Daniel Rushing was injured while working for ALCOA. On its accident report form, ALCOA checked the box "yes" next to the question "Will you pay this employee full salary or wages during…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- King County v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Rhoad v. McLEAN TRUCKING COMPANYWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Rector v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hi-Way Fuel Co. v. Estate of AllynCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Hi-Way Fuel Co. v. Estate of AllynCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Vaux-Michel v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Courtney R. Black, V Comcast CorporationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- In Re Estate Of T. Mark Stover Teresa Vaux-michel, Resp/cr-app. v. Anne Simmons, App./cr-resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013